Mediation at the heart of the 21st century’s justice
The most recent French and European reforms encourage ADR methods and emphasizes their importance in modern justice.
The March 11, 2015 decree provides that all subpoena must specify “the steps taken to reach an amicable resolution before filing the claim in court.”
Beyond the debates about the practical consequences of such provision, the message of the ministry of Justice is clear: a place must be made to ADR. The judges are at the heart of this new paradigm. This same decree also amended Article 127 of the Civil Procedural Code which now states that ‘if no procedures oblige the companies to find an amicable resolution to their conflict, in accordance with Articles 56 and 58, the judge can propose conciliation or of mediation to the parties. “
CMAP at your side to help you in your justice mission
The CMAP is unique in France. It is composed of lawyers and advisors such as law professors and honorary judges. The CMAP guarantees the appointment of trained and qualified mediators and the respect of the rules the mediation.
CMAP’s team
Our team includes a dedicated ADR section (for “Alternative Dispute Resolution”) composed of lawyers who manage all the cases and procedures and assist the mediators and arbitrators for any question which arises. The ADR section allows the capitalization of the all CMAP’s experience.
As a result, each judge has a dedicated and personalized interlocutor for each CMAP case. Thus guaranteeing customized, qualitative and skilled support.
CMAP’s advisors
For specifically complex and technical questions regarding the implementation of alternative dispute resolution, CMAP refers to former judges and renowned academics as adivsors. To learn more about our advisors.
CMAP’s mediators
CMAP has more than a hundred duly accredited mediators. In order to be accredited by CMAP, all mediators were trained, evaluated, certified and approved. Mediators come from all sectors and from various professional backgrounds. For example, our panel includes entrepreneurs , managing directors, auditors, former judges and many others. This enables us to meet all parties’ needs.
CMAP helps the judge and / the parties to choose the appropriate mediator. The judge and the parties are asked to determine the mediator’s selection criteria. At this phase, the magistrate’s knowledge of the case is key.
On this basis, our Mediation Committee shortlists three mediators within 24 to 48 hours. This list is provided to the judge who takes the final decision, unless he/she wants to leave it to the parties or to CMAP.
How do I select the cases for mediation?
It may appear difficult to assess whether or not to refer a case to mediation.
Are there any sectors or conflict types that are better than others? Should some cases not go to mediation ?
All those questions and others are legitimate. Feel free to contact us and our team will assist you in this crucial step. You can trust our 20 years of successful experience with all tribunals and courts.
File your request
Feel free to contact us here.